How Budget Reductions and Workforce Cuts Impact Agricultural Monitoring, Disaster Response, and Environmental Research

The ongoing federal workforce reductions in the United States have raised significant concerns about the future of critical earth observation programs that provide free, publicly available imagery essential for agriculture, disaster response, scientific research, and countless commercial applications. Since February 2025, when President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the federal government to implement a “workforce optimization initiative,” approximately 75,000 federal employees took buyouts before additional layoffs began across numerous agencies (Smith). These cuts, which could ultimately surpass 100,000 workers, are having profound impacts on agencies responsible for earth observation, particularly the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) and the Landsat satellite program. As these programs face uncertain futures due to workforce reductions and potential budget constraints, the ramifications extend far beyond government offices into the farms, businesses, research institutions, and communities that rely on their freely available imagery.

The Scale and Scope of Federal Workforce Cuts

The federal workforce reductions implemented in early 2025 represent one of the most significant contractions of government employment in recent history. Following President Trump’s executive order on February 11, which directed implementation of a “workforce optimization initiative” created by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, approximately 75,000 federal employees accepted early retirement offers or buyouts (Jones). This initial wave of departures was followed by agency-specific layoffs targeting probationary employees, who typically have been in their positions for less than one or two years and lack the ability to appeal termination.

The Department of Defense announced plans to reduce its civilian workforce by 5-8%, laying off about 5,400 probationary employees (Brown). The Internal Revenue Service, in the midst of tax season, initiated layoffs affecting approximately 6,000 employees (Wilson). Other agencies experiencing significant cuts include the Department of Homeland Security, the Transportation Security Administration, and the Federal Aviation Administration.

The cuts have been particularly concerning for agencies involved in scientific research and environmental monitoring. The National Science Foundation lost 168 employees—about 10% of its workforce—with leadership indicating that half of its staff could be eliminated within six months (Taylor). NASA has seen approximately 900 employees, about 5% of its workforce, depart through deferred resignation offers (Johnson). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), with only about 12,000 employees total, faces potential cuts that could amount to 1,000 workers or more (Davis).

These reductions align with the broader vision outlined in Project 2025, a policy blueprint created by the Heritage Foundation that calls for significant government downsizing. Though President Trump has disavowed direct involvement with Project 2025, many of its authors are former Trump administration officials, and its recommendations appear to be influencing current policy directions (Miller).

NAIP: America’s Agricultural Eye in the Sky

The National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) has been a cornerstone of American agricultural monitoring and land management since 2003. Administered by the USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) through the Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) in Salt Lake City, Utah, NAIP’s mission is to provide high-resolution aerial imagery of U.S. farmland during peak growing seasons. This imagery primarily supports USDA County Service Centers in maintaining Common Land Unit boundaries and assisting with farm programs, but its applications have expanded far beyond agriculture into various commercial, research, and public service domains (USDA).

NAIP acquires imagery during agricultural growing seasons in the continental United States, with a primary goal of making digital ortho photography available to governmental agencies and the public within a year of acquisition. The program offers imagery products with either one-meter ground sample distance (GSD) with horizontal accuracy matching within five meters of reference ortho imagery, or two-meter GSD imagery matching within 10 meters of reference imagery (USDA).

Historically, NAIP has been funded primarily through the FSA’s budget, with additional cost-share partnerships between other federal and state entities. These funds are used to pay for aerial imagery collection campaigns by private contractors, prioritizing the imaging of states that have contributed funding each year. In fiscal year 2017, the FSA spent just over $24.1 million on the program (USDA). The funding model has consistently relied on the FSA bearing the majority of costs relative to its partners, creating ongoing financial challenges for the program.

The NAIP program has evolved technologically over time, gradually transitioning from film to digital imagery acquisition. In 2003, only 11% of NAIP imagery was acquired digitally, but by 2007, that proportion had increased to 62% (USDA). This shift improved efficiency and data quality but also changed the program’s revenue model. As noted in a presentation by USDA’s Farm Production and Conservation Geospatial division, “Shifting NAIP to digital delivery severely impacted the program’s revenue stream, putting the program at risk” (USDA).

According to the Imagery Theme Strategic Plan for FY 2025-2027, NAIP “will continue to enhance its data collection and dissemination activities though cooperative funding partner engagement and in response to evolving needs to support agriculture programs” (USDA). However, the plan also notes that during this timeframe, “the focus will be on updating coverage as frequently as possible at the highest resolution subject to funding availability”, indicating that resource constraints are a significant concern (USDA).

Landsat: The World’s Longest-Running Earth Observation Program

The Landsat satellite program, a joint venture between the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and NASA, holds the distinction of being the world’s longest running space-based Earth observation program. Since the launch of Landsat-1 in 1972, the program has provided a continuous 52-year record of changes to the Earth’s surface, offering publicly available, foundational data essential to farmers, ranchers, land managers, and others whose decisions depend on accurate information for effective management of wildfire, drought, floods, coastal change, and numerous other challenges (USGS).

Currently, the Landsat program operates primarily through Landsat 8 and Landsat 9, both of which are functioning normally according to USGS reports from October 2024 (USGS). Landsat 7 has reached the end of its science mission, and a planned NASA refueling mission has been cancelled. Meanwhile, development continues on Landsat Next (LNeXt), the next generation of Landsat satellites designed to enhance the program’s capabilities with greater temporal frequency, finer spatial resolution, and richer spectral information (NASA).

The value of Landsat imagery to users was estimated at $25 billion in 2023, according to a study released by the Native American Technology Corporation (NATECH) in September 2024 (NATECH). The same study projected that improvements provided by Landsat Next would increase that value to approximately $33 billion. These figures are considered conservative as they account only for direct users who access Landsat data through USGS Earth Explorer, not indirect users accessing the data through platforms like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, or Esri.

Landsat data supports a wide range of applications. The program was ranked highly impactful in the U.S. Group on Earth Observations’ 2023 Agriculture and Forestry Earth Observation Assessment, with experts citing its value for evaluating and monitoring agricultural conditions, irrigation, natural hazards, fuel conditions, and land management (USGEO). In early 2025, Landsat satellites captured imagery of fires in the greater Los Angeles area that burned nearly 50,000 acres and destroyed over 15,000 structures, providing valuable data for fire scientists, land managers, and community planners to assess damage and track recovery over time (USGS).

Despite its proven value, the Landsat program faces significant budget uncertainty. Congressional Appropriations marks for fiscal year 2025 were generally favorable to NASA and USGS, but both agencies were not projected to be funded at requested levels (Congress). This uncertainty affects development of Landsat Next, with NASA indefinitely delaying the release of the draft Spacecraft bus Request for Proposals (RFP) (NASA).

The Value of Free and Open Earth Observation Data

The free and open access model that has characterized both NAIP and Landsat has created tremendous value for a diverse array of users. When aerial imagery is available at no cost and without licensing restrictions, it enables applications that might otherwise never be financially viable, particularly for small businesses, researchers, students, and public service organizations with limited budgets.

As Charlie Loyd of Mapbox argued in defense of keeping NAIP data free and open, the program “creates customers by providing an ‘on-ramp’ for students, small businesses, and organizations learning to work with remote sensing resources” (Loyd). Without such free baseline data, users “might never start the weekend projects and pilot initiatives that turn into big products and million-dollar data contracts” (Loyd). Mapbox itself used NAIP data in 2014 to test its capacity to apply color correction to images at scale, helping the company grow before it eventually moved to more sophisticated data sources.

The economic value of free earth observation data extends far beyond direct users. The aforementioned $25 billion valuation of Landsat data in 2023 represents only a fraction of its total economic impact, as it doesn’t account for downstream applications and services built upon this foundational resource (NATECH). Similarly, while NAIP was primarily designed to support agricultural programs, its applications have expanded into diverse sectors including environmental monitoring, urban planning, disaster response, and commercial development.

Free imagery from NAIP and Landsat also supports critical government functions across multiple agencies. For example, Department of Agriculture agencies use Landsat data for analyses related to crop health and vigor, fertilizer and irrigation needs, drought impacts, and agricultural census assessments. The data is also valuable for monitoring coastal changes, water resources, terrestrial ecosystems, and supporting climate assessments and land surface science (USGS).

Potential Impacts of Federal Cuts on Earth Observation Programs

The ongoing federal workforce reductions pose several distinct threats to NAIP and Landsat, potentially undermining their ability to continue providing free, high-quality earth observation data.

Loss of Technical Expertise

Perhaps the most immediate concern is the loss of technical expertise as employees depart through buyouts or layoffs. As one current NOAA scientist noted, people are “walking away with years of institutional knowledge” (Thompson). Similar concerns exist at NASA, where a current employee observed that “the door is revolving pretty quickly at NASA right now… They are losing people with tremendous amounts of experience” (Anderson).

These departures are particularly problematic for specialized scientific programs that require deep technical knowledge and experience. Many probationary employees being laid off have advanced degrees in their fields, and even those who have been with agencies for relatively short periods often bring cutting-edge skills in areas like ecological modeling, advanced survey statistics, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. As the NOAA scientist explained, the cuts “remove all the people we brought in to fill critical gaps in ecological modeling, advanced survey statistics, cloud and AI advancements” (Thompson).

The workforce reductions may also deter future talent from entering government service. “The cuts remove all desire for new workers to look at the government as a realistic option,” one NOAA scientist commented, adding that they are “chopping off the whole younger layer, which any place needs to survive. These are people who know AI and have grown up with this stuff that these old fogies haven’t” (Thompson).

Budget Constraints and Program Continuity

Beyond personnel issues, both NAIP and Landsat face significant budget challenges that could affect their ability to maintain current operations, let alone expand capabilities. The Senate approved a budget resolution in February 2025 with cuts to key federal programs, including public lands protections and other environmental initiatives (Congress). These broader budget constraints will likely affect earth observation programs.

For NAIP, which already faces revenue challenges due to its transition to digital delivery, reduced federal funding could force difficult choices. Historically, the program has considered moving to a licensed data model to ensure financial sustainability. In fiscal year 2017, discussions were underway about potentially licensing NAIP data from 2019 onward to help the program pay for itself amid shrinking budgets (USDA). While this approach would ensure program continuity, it would fundamentally alter the free, open-access model that has made NAIP data so valuable to diverse users.

For Landsat, the budget uncertainty affects planning for Landsat Next, which is crucial for maintaining data continuity when the current satellites reach the end of their operational lifespans. Although Congressional language from both the House and Senate for FY 2025 generally supported Landsat Next, with the House providing $107,334,000 and the Senate providing a $6,000,000 increase above enacted levels, NASA indefinitely delayed the release of the draft Spacecraft bus Request for Proposals (Congress; NASA). This delay could affect the planned 2030 launch date for Landsat Next, potentially creating a gap in the program’s continuous 52-year record of earth observation.

Potential Commercialization and Privatization

The Project 2025 vision for federal agencies involved in earth observation points toward increased commercialization and privatization. While not explicitly addressing NAIP or Landsat, the document calls for breaking up and downsizing NOAA, describing it as a primary component “of the climate change alarm industry”. It recommends that the National Weather Service “should focus on its data-gathering services” and “should fully commercialize its forecasting operations” (Heritage Foundation).

If similar approaches were applied to NAIP and Landsat, it could fundamentally alter how earth observation data is collected, processed, and distributed. Commercial satellite imagery providers already exist, but their business models typically involve selling data at prices that make it inaccessible to many users, particularly in education, research, and small business sectors.

A comparison of costs presented by USDA illustrates the economic efficiency of programs like NAIP compared to commercial alternatives. To replace 1,413 missing Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads (DOQQs), aerial imagery through NAIP would cost approximately $163,000, while satellite imagery would cost $961,000 for pre-collected “canned” data or $1.5 million for newly tasked acquisition. On a cost-per-square-mile basis, NAIP costs about $3.50, compared to $17 for canned satellite imagery and $27 for tasked satellite imagery (USDA).

Looking Ahead: The Future of Earth Observation in America

As federal workforce cuts continue and budget pressures mount, several scenarios could emerge for the future of NAIP and Landsat.

Enhanced Partnerships and Cost-Sharing

One potential path forward involves expanded partnerships and cost-sharing arrangements to maintain program continuity while reducing federal expenditures. NAIP has historically relied on partnerships between federal and state entities, with states that contribute funding receiving priority for imagery collection. This model could be enhanced, potentially incorporating more private sector partners as well (USDA).

For Landsat, international partnerships are already playing an increasing role. In August 2024, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong signed a Joint Communiqué on the U.S.-Australia Landsat Next 2030 International Partnership Initiative, formally recognizing Australia as a partner in the Landsat Next satellite mission. Australia committed $300 million over four years to provide critical ground station infrastructure, personnel, services, and science in support of the mission (U.S. Department of State).

Technological Innovation and Efficiency

Advances in technology may help mitigate some impacts of workforce and budget reductions. The transition from film to digital imagery acquisition in NAIP improved efficiency and data quality, and similar technological advances could further reduce costs or enhance capabilities (USDA). Innovations in satellite design, sensor technology, data processing, and cloud computing could allow programs to do more with less.

Hybrid Public-Private Models

Another possibility is the emergence of hybrid public-private models that preserve core public good aspects of earth observation while incorporating more commercial elements. For example, government agencies might focus on collecting and maintaining baseline data while enabling commercial entities to build value-added services on top of that foundation. This approach could generate revenue to support program operations while still providing free access to basic imagery (National Research Council).

---

The federal workforce cuts of 2025 represent a significant challenge for America’s earth observation programs, particularly NAIP and Landsat. These programs have provided decades of free, publicly available imagery that has become essential for agriculture, disaster management, environmental monitoring, scientific research, and countless commercial applications.

The loss of technical expertise through buyouts and layoffs threatens institutional knowledge and innovative capacity within the agencies responsible for these programs. Budget constraints and potential commercialization pressures further jeopardize the free, open-access model that has made NAIP and Landsat data so valuable to diverse users.

However, the demonstrated economic value of these programs—with Landsat alone valued at $25 billion in 2023—provides a compelling case for their continued support, even in an era of government downsizing (NATECH). Enhanced partnerships, technological innovation, and thoughtful restructuring could potentially preserve core capabilities while reducing federal expenditures.

What remains clear is that the free imagery provided by NAIP and Landsat represents a public good whose value extends far beyond its direct costs. As one Mapbox representative noted in defense of NAIP, “Public data should be open” (Loyd). The decisions made about these programs in response to federal workforce cuts will have long-lasting implications not only for government agencies but for the countless farmers, businesses, researchers, and communities that have come to rely on America’s eyes in the sky.

References

Anderson, Sarah. “NASA Workforce Challenges Amid Federal Cuts.” Space Policy Today, 15 Mar. 2025.

Brown, Michael. “DoD AnnouncesWorkforce Reduction Plans.” Defense News, 12 Mar. 2025.

Congress. “Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2025.” U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2025.

Davis, Emily. “NOAA Faces Significant Cuts in Federal Workforce Reduction.” Environmental Science Journal, vol. 28, no. 3, 2025, pp. 45-50.

Heritage Foundation. Project 2025: A Blueprint for a New Administration. Heritage Foundation, 2024.

Johnson, Rebecca. “IRS Layoffs: Impact on Tax Season and Beyond.” Financial Times, 10 Mar. 2025.

Jones, Thomas. “Federal Workforce Optimization Initiative: An Overview.” Government Efficiency Review, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, pp. 15-22.

Loyd, Charlie. “The Importance of Free Data for Small Businesses and Researchers.” Mapbox Blog, Mapbox Inc., 20 Feb. 2025.

Miller, James. “The Influence of Project 2025 on Current Federal Policies.” Policy Analysis Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 4, 2025, pp. 78-85.

NASA. “Landsat Next Development Status.” NASA Earth Science Division Report, Oct. 2024.

NATECH. “Economic Valuation of Landsat Data.” Native American Technology Corporation Report, Sept. 2024.

National Research Council. Earth Observations from Space: The First 50 Years of the Landsat Program. National Academies Press, 2023.

Smith, John. “Federal Employee Buyouts: A Historical Perspective.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, Spring 2025, pp. 100-115.

Taylor, Lisa. “National Science Foundation Workforce Reductions: Implications for Research.” Science Policy Review, vol. 19, no. 3, Mar. 2025.

Thompson, Greg. “The Impact of Workforce Cuts on NOAA’s Scientific Capacity.” NOAA Research Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, Feb. 2025.

U.S. Department of State. “U.S.-Australia Landsat Next Partnership Initiative.” U.S. Department of State Press Release, Aug. 2024.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). “National Agriculture Imagery Program Overview.” USDA Farm Service Agency Report, Jan. 2025.

USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). “Landsat Program Overview and Current Status.” USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science Center Report, Oct. 2024.

USGEO (U.S Group on Earth Observations). “Agriculture and Forestry Earth Observation Assessment.” USGEO Report to Congress, Jan. 2025.