Based on the recent power outage at London Heathrow Airport that caused a complete shutdown on March 21, 2025, I’ll explain the emergency backup power systems at major airports like Heathrow and why they sometimes fail to keep operations running.
Types of Backup Power Systems at Major Airports
1. Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS)
These battery-based systems provide immediate but short-term power during outages. According to the Heathrow source cited in the BBC report, the airport does have “uninterruptable power supplies” in place that “operated as expected” during the recent outage.
Advantages:
- Instant power transition with no gap
- Protects sensitive equipment from power surges
- Critical for air traffic control systems
Limitations:
- Typically only lasts minutes to hours
- Designed for critical systems only, not entire airport operations
2. Diesel Generators
These provide longer-term emergency power and are standard at most airports. Heathrow confirmed they have diesel generators as part of their “multiple sources” of energy.
Advantages:
- Can run for days with sufficient fuel
- Higher capacity than UPS systems
- More cost-effective for longer outages
Limitations:
- Takes time to start up (not instant)
- Requires regular maintenance and testing
- Limited capacity compared to main power supply
3. Redundant Grid Connections
Many airports have connections to multiple substations or power grids. However, as we saw with Heathrow, the Hayes substation was described by National Grid as “a particularly important bit” of infrastructure.
Advantages:
- Provides alternative power sources if one fails
- Can maintain normal operations if properly implemented
Limitations:
- Expensive to implement fully
- May still have single points of failure
- Requires complex switching systems
Why Backup Systems Aren’t Enough
The recent Heathrow incident highlights several key limitations of airport backup power systems:
1. Scale Limitations
According to the Heathrow source quoted in the BBC report: “The systems, however, are not enough to run the whole airport – hence the decision to close it down.” Backup systems are typically designed to power only the most critical functions, not entire airport operations.
2. Cascading Failures
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband noted that “there was a back-up generator, but that was also affected by the fire,” showing how a single incident can compromise both primary and secondary systems.
3. Interconnected Systems
Airports rely on numerous interconnected systems. As the Heathrow source explained, the airport has “interconnected systems, including IT, heating and lighting. Some have back-ups, but others are still offline.” Even if power is available for some systems, the airport can’t function without all critical systems online.
4. Restart Complexity
Even after power is restored, there’s significant complexity in restarting airport operations. As a Heathrow source noted, they are “in the process of redirecting power to the affected parts of the operation – but that it ‘takes time’.” Additionally, countless systems need to be rebooted and checked for stability.
The Vulnerability Question
The recent incident raises serious questions about infrastructure resilience. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband admitted that Heathrow’s closure makes the airport look “quite vulnerable,” while the Prime Minister’s spokesperson suggested “checks on resilience” should be carried out.
The scale of disruption—affecting over 1,350 flights and thousands of passengers—demonstrates how even sophisticated backup systems can fail to prevent major operational disruptions when faced with certain types of infrastructure failures.
Conclusion
While Heathrow and other major airports do have multiple layers of backup power systems, these are designed primarily to maintain safety-critical functions rather than normal operations. The recent incident highlights the vulnerability of even the most critical infrastructure to cascading failures and the need for improved resilience planning.
Sources: